Fonte | Tribunal Superior do Trabalho<\/p>\n
RECURSO ORDIN\u00c1RIO. A\u00c7\u00c3O RESCIS\u00d3RIA. PRETENS\u00c3O DESCONSTITUTIVA CALCADA NO ARGUMENTO DE COLUS\u00c3O DAS PARTES.MINIST\u00c9RIO P\u00daBLICO DO TRABALHO. CONDENA\u00c7\u00c3O EM HONOR\u00c1RIOS ADVOCAT\u00cdCIOS. Nos termos do artigo 127, “caput”, da Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o Federal, o Minist\u00e9rio P\u00fablico \u00e9 institui\u00e7\u00e3o permanente, essencial \u00e0 fun\u00e7\u00e3o jurisdicional do Estado, incumbindo-lhe a defesa da ordem jur\u00eddica, do regime democr\u00e1tico e dos interesses individuais indispon\u00edveis. Na hip\u00f3tese, o Minist\u00e9rio P\u00fablico do Trabalho ajuizou a\u00e7\u00e3o rescis\u00f3ria, com base nos incisos III e IV do artigo 485 do CPC, objetivando a desconstitui\u00e7\u00e3o da senten\u00e7a em que\u00a0homologado acordo celebrado pelas partes, nos autos da reclama\u00e7\u00e3o trabalhista. Com efeito,\u00a0 infere-se que o Minist\u00e9rio P\u00fablico doTrabalho, na presente a\u00e7\u00e3o, est\u00e1 tutelando a ordem jur\u00eddica, interesse p\u00fablico prim\u00e1rio, buscando evitar a utiliza\u00e7\u00e3o do processo com intuito fraudulento, devendo os honor\u00e1rios advocat\u00edcios estar condicionados \u00e0 eventual m\u00e1-f\u00e9 no ajuizamento da a\u00e7\u00e3o rescis\u00f3ria, por aplica\u00e7\u00e3o anal\u00f3gica do artigo 18 da Lei n\u00ba 7.347\/1985, n\u00e3o obstante a atual reda\u00e7\u00e3o do item II da S\u00famula n\u00ba 219 do TST. Recurso ordin\u00e1rio conhecido e provido.\u00a0<\/strong> <\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Condena\u00e7\u00e3o em honor\u00e1rios advocat\u00edcios. Fonte | Tribunal Superior do Trabalho RECURSO ORDIN\u00c1RIO. A\u00c7\u00c3O RESCIS\u00d3RIA. PRETENS\u00c3O…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":24,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"sfsi_plus_gutenberg_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_show_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_type":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_alignemt":"","sfsi_plus_gutenburg_max_per_row":"","_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"_uf_show_specific_survey":0,"_uf_disable_surveys":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-823","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-jurisprudencias"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/823","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=823"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/823\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":824,"href":"https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/823\/revisions\/824"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/24"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=823"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=823"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=823"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\nProcesso n\u00ba 123700-69.2003.5.15.0000<\/strong><\/p>\n