{"id":57,"date":"2013-10-18T01:09:03","date_gmt":"2013-10-18T01:09:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/?p=57"},"modified":"2013-10-18T01:09:03","modified_gmt":"2013-10-18T01:09:03","slug":"administrativo-e-processual-civil","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/?p=57","title":{"rendered":"Administrativo e processual civil."},"content":{"rendered":"<h2>Ensino superior. Revalida\u00e7\u00e3o de diploma estrangeiro. Submiss\u00e3o a procedimento da universidade.<\/h2>\n<p>Fonte | Superior Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a<\/p>\n<div id=\"textocompleto\">\n<div id=\"parteTexto_0\">\n<p><strong>EMENTA<\/strong><br \/>\nADMINISTRATIVO E PROCESSUAL CIVIL \u2013 ENSINO SUPERIOR \u2013 REVALIDA\u00c7\u00c3O DE DIPLOMA ESTRANGEIRO \u2013 SUBMISS\u00c3O A PROCEDIMENTO DA UNIVERSIDADE \u2013 LEI 9.394\/1996 \u2013 VIOLA\u00c7\u00c3O DO ART. 535 DO CPC N\u00c3O CARACTERIZADA \u2013 DEFICI\u00caNCIA NA FUNDAMENTA\u00c7\u00c3O: S\u00daMULA 284\/STF \u2013 INEXIST\u00caNCIA DE VIOLA\u00c7\u00c3O DO ART. 475 DO CPC \u2013 VIOLA\u00c7\u00c3O A RESOLU\u00c7\u00c3O DO CNE \u2013 N\u00c3O-CABIMENTO DO RECURSO ESPECIAL \u2013 CONCEITO DE LEI FEDERAL.<br \/>\n<strong>1.<\/strong>\u00a0N\u00e3o h\u00e1 como esta Corte analisar viola\u00e7\u00e3o do art. 535 do CPC quando o recorrente n\u00e3o aponta com clareza e precis\u00e3o as teses sobre as quais o Tribunal de origem teria sido omisso. Incid\u00eancia da S\u00famula 284\/STF.<br \/>\n<strong>2.<\/strong>\u00a0Inexiste ofensa ao art. 475 do CPC, na hip\u00f3tese de o Tribunal de origem analisar integralmente a mat\u00e9ria devolvida em remessa necess\u00e1ria, ainda que por ocasi\u00e3o do julgamento dos embargos de declara\u00e7\u00e3o opostos.<br \/>\n<strong>3.<\/strong>\u00a0Afasta-se o malferimento \u00e0s normas da Lei 9.394\/1996, referentes \u00e0 finalidade da educa\u00e7\u00e3o superior e ao processo de revalida\u00e7\u00e3o de diploma expedido por institui\u00e7\u00e3o estrangeira (arts. 43, II, e 48, \u00a7 2\u00ba), tendo em vista sua estrita observ\u00e2ncia.<br \/>\n<strong>4.<\/strong>\u00a0Invi\u00e1vel a revis\u00e3o do julgado, em recurso especial, referente \u00e0 aplica\u00e7\u00e3o dos procedimentos previstos na Portaria Ministerial n\u00ba 865\/2009, em detrimento da Resolu\u00e7\u00e3o CNE\/CES n\u00ba 1\/2002, uma vez que esses atos administrativos n\u00e3o se enquadram no conceito de &#8220;tratado ou lei federal&#8221; inserido na al\u00ednea &#8220;a&#8221; do inciso II do art. 105 da Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o da Rep\u00fablica de 1988.<br \/>\n<strong>5.<\/strong>\u00a0Recurso especial parcialmente conhecido e n\u00e3o provido.<br \/>\n<strong><a href=\"http:\/\/jornal.jurid.com.br\/materias\/noticias\/revalidacao-diploma-estrangeiro-na-jurisprudencia-stj\" target=\"_blank\">Processo n\u00ba 2011\/0255384-7<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/10\/a01-jurisprudencia.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-24\" alt=\"a01 jurisprudencia\" src=\"http:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/10\/a01-jurisprudencia.jpg\" width=\"500\" height=\"500\" srcset=\"https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/10\/a01-jurisprudencia.jpg 500w, https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/10\/a01-jurisprudencia-150x150.jpg 150w, https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/10\/a01-jurisprudencia-300x300.jpg 300w, https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/10\/a01-jurisprudencia-55x55.jpg 55w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Ensino superior. Revalida\u00e7\u00e3o de diploma estrangeiro. Submiss\u00e3o a procedimento da universidade. Fonte | Superior Tribunal&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":24,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"sfsi_plus_gutenberg_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_show_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_type":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_alignemt":"","sfsi_plus_gutenburg_max_per_row":"","_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"_uf_show_specific_survey":0,"_uf_disable_surveys":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-57","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-jurisprudencias"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=57"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":58,"href":"https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57\/revisions\/58"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/24"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=57"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=57"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=57"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}