{"id":495,"date":"2013-10-27T14:13:39","date_gmt":"2013-10-27T14:13:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/?p=495"},"modified":"2013-10-27T14:13:39","modified_gmt":"2013-10-27T14:13:39","slug":"processual-civil","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/?p=495","title":{"rendered":"Processual civil."},"content":{"rendered":"<h2>Agravo interno contra decis\u00e3o que deferiu antecipa\u00e7\u00e3o de tutela em agravo de instrumento.<\/h2>\n<p>Fonte | Tribunal Regional Federal da 2\u00aa Regi\u00e3o<\/p>\n<div id=\"textocompleto\">\n<div id=\"parteTexto_0\">\n<p>\u201cPROCESSUAL CIVIL. AGRAVO INTERNO CONTRA DECIS\u00c3O QUE DEFERIU ANTECIPA\u00c7\u00c3O DE TUTELA EM AGRAVO DE INSTRUMENTO. IRRECORRIBILIDADE. ART. 527, PAR\u00c1GRAFO \u00daNICO, DO CPC. INAPLICABILIDADE DO ART. 39 DA LEI N. 8.038\/1990.<br \/>\n<strong>1<\/strong>. Em aten\u00e7\u00e3o aos Princ\u00edpios da Celeridade e da Razo\u00e1vel Dura\u00e7\u00e3o do Processo (art. 5\u00ba, inciso LXXVIII, da Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o Federal) a Lei n. 11.187\/2005, modificando a sistem\u00e1tica do agravo de instrumento, introduziu no art. 527 do CPC altera\u00e7\u00e3o que vedou a interposi\u00e7\u00e3o de recurso de decis\u00e3o que conceder efeito suspensivo ou deferir, em antecipa\u00e7\u00e3o de tutela, total ou parcialmente, a pretens\u00e3o recursal.<br \/>\n<strong>2<\/strong>. Incab\u00edvel agravo interno de decis\u00e3o liminar de relator no \u00e2mbito do agravo de instrumento. Decis\u00e3o irrecorr\u00edvel, somente pass\u00edvel de reforma no momento do julgamento do agravo, salvo se o pr\u00f3prio relator reconsider\u00e1-la (art. 527, par\u00e1grafo \u00fanico, do CPC) ou por meio de mandado de seguran\u00e7a.<br \/>\n<strong>3.<\/strong>\u00a0Precedentes: RMS 25.949\/BA, Rel. Min. Luiz Fux, Primeira Turma, julgado em 4.3.2010, DJe 23.3.2010; RMS 28.515\/PE, Rel. Min. Benedito Gon\u00e7alves, Primeira Turma, julgado em 2.4.2009, DJe 20.4.2009; RMS 30.608\/RN, Rel. Min. Castro Meira, Segunda Turma, julgado em 2.3.2010, DJe 10.3.2010.<br \/>\n<strong>4.<\/strong>\u00a0Inaplic\u00e1vel ao caso interpreta\u00e7\u00e3o anal\u00f3gica do art. 39 da Lei n. 8.038\/90, ante a veda\u00e7\u00e3o expressa do art. 527, par\u00e1grafo \u00fanico, do CPC. Agravo regimental provido.\u201d<br \/>\n<strong><a href=\"http:\/\/jornal.jurid.com.br\/materias\/noticias\/ans-deve-considerar-apenas-infracoes-confirmadas\" target=\"_blank\">Processo n\u00ba 2013.02.01.011510-0<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/10\/a01-jurisprudencia.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-24\" alt=\"a01 jurisprudencia\" src=\"http:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/10\/a01-jurisprudencia.jpg\" width=\"500\" height=\"500\" srcset=\"https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/10\/a01-jurisprudencia.jpg 500w, https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/10\/a01-jurisprudencia-150x150.jpg 150w, https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/10\/a01-jurisprudencia-300x300.jpg 300w, https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/10\/a01-jurisprudencia-55x55.jpg 55w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Agravo interno contra decis\u00e3o que deferiu antecipa\u00e7\u00e3o de tutela em agravo de instrumento. Fonte |&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":24,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"sfsi_plus_gutenberg_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_show_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_type":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_alignemt":"","sfsi_plus_gutenburg_max_per_row":"","_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"_uf_show_specific_survey":0,"_uf_disable_surveys":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-495","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-jurisprudencias"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/495","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=495"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/495\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":496,"href":"https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/495\/revisions\/496"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/24"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=495"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=495"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=495"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}