{"id":2339,"date":"2015-01-08T00:24:07","date_gmt":"2015-01-08T00:24:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/?p=2339"},"modified":"2015-01-08T00:24:07","modified_gmt":"2015-01-08T00:24:07","slug":"acao-de-arbitramento-e-cobranca","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/?p=2339","title":{"rendered":"A\u00e7\u00e3o de Arbitramento e Cobran\u00e7a"},"content":{"rendered":"<h3>Honor\u00e1rios Advocat\u00edcios<\/h3>\n<p>Fonte | TJSP<\/p>\n<p>HONOR\u00c1RIOS ADVOCAT\u00cdCIOS. A\u00c7\u00c3O DE ARBITRAMENTO E COBRAN\u00c7A. PLEITO DE MEDIDA CONSTRITIVA PATRIMONIAL COMO FORMA DE GARANTIR FUTURA EXECU\u00c7\u00c3O. POSSIBILIDADE DO DEFERIMENTO NO CURSO DO PROCESSO. PRESEN\u00c7A DOS REQUISITOS LEGAIS. AGRAVO IMPROVIDO.1. O autor alega que atuou como advogado em favor dos ora r\u00e9us em demanda indenizat\u00f3ria, tendo sido revogado o mandato em fase avan\u00e7ada do processo.2. Identificada a verossimilhan\u00e7a da alega\u00e7\u00e3o, pois o servi\u00e7o foi prestado e disso decorre naturalmente o direito \u00e0 remunera\u00e7\u00e3o, e sendo ineg\u00e1vel o risco de resultar frustrada a futura eventual execu\u00e7\u00e3o, apresenta-se perfeitamente adequada a provid\u00eancia cautelar constritiva incidente sobre 30% do valor do cr\u00e9dito dos demandados, que dever\u00e1 permanecer em dep\u00f3sito judicial.<\/p>\n<p>(TJSP &#8211; Agravo de Instrumento \/ Honor\u00e1rios Advocat\u00edcios n\u00ba 2216942-07.2014.8.26.0000 &#8211; Mar\u00edlia\/SP &#8211; 31\u00aa C\u00e2mara de Direito Privado &#8211; Rel. Antonio Rigolin &#8211; J. 16.12.2014 &#8211; DJE. 17.12.2014)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Honor\u00e1rios Advocat\u00edcios Fonte | TJSP HONOR\u00c1RIOS ADVOCAT\u00cdCIOS. A\u00c7\u00c3O DE ARBITRAMENTO E COBRAN\u00c7A. PLEITO DE MEDIDA&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2090,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"sfsi_plus_gutenberg_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_show_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_type":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_alignemt":"","sfsi_plus_gutenburg_max_per_row":"","_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"_uf_show_specific_survey":0,"_uf_disable_surveys":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2339","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-jurisprudencias"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2339","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2339"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2339\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2340,"href":"https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2339\/revisions\/2340"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/2090"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2339"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2339"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2339"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}