Fonte | Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a de Minas Gerais<\/p>\n
EMENTA<\/strong> Negativa de cobertura do tratamento indicado fora do estado de abrang\u00eancia do plano. Fonte |…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":996,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"sfsi_plus_gutenberg_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_show_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_type":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_alignemt":"","sfsi_plus_gutenburg_max_per_row":"","_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"_uf_show_specific_survey":0,"_uf_disable_surveys":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1280","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-jurisprudencias"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1280","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1280"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1280\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1281,"href":"https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1280\/revisions\/1281"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/996"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1280"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1280"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gerolimich.adv.br\/adv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1280"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\nA\u00c7\u00c3O COMINAT\u00d3RIA – PLANO DE SA\u00daDE – APLICABILIDADE DO CDC – NEGATIVA DE COBERTURA DO TRATAMENTO INDICADO FORA DO ESTADO DE ABRANG\u00caNCIA DO PLANO – INTERPRETA\u00c7\u00c3O DAS CL\u00c1USULAS COM BASE NA BOA-F\u00c9 OBJETIVA E NA FUN\u00c7\u00c3O SOCIAL DOS CONTRATOS – INDICA\u00c7\u00c3O M\u00c9DICA – NECESSIDADE DEATENDIMENTO FORA DA \u00c1REA DE COBERTURA CONSTATADA – DEVER DE COBERTURA – EMBARGOS DECLARAT\u00d3RIOS OPOSTOS – FIXA\u00c7\u00c3O DE MULTA POR INTUITO MERAMENTE PROTELAT\u00d3RIO – N\u00c3O\u00a0 VERIFICA\u00c7\u00c3O – RETIRADA DA PENALIDADE – SENTEN\u00c7A REFORMADAPARCIALMENTE.
\nProcesso n\u00ba 1.0223.10.022624-8\/002<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"